Criminal Defense Articles | Pros and Cons of Criminal Defense

Criminal-Defense Articles > Pros and Cons of Criminal Defense

Pros and Cons of Criminal Defense
Trial of a person for an act that has been classified as a crime by the government is termed as "criminal law". What crime is! A "crime" is an act or omission (of an act) in violation of a public law forbidding or commanding it. In the United States local, state, and federal governments establish most crimes, even though there are some common law crimes.

From state to state, criminal laws vary significantly. However, to gain an understanding of the basic structure of criminal liability, one needs to go through Model Penal Code (MPC), which serves as a good starting place. However, no act is a crime if it has not been previously established as such either by statute or common law. Recently, the list of Federal crimes, dealing with activities extending beyond state boundaries or having special impact on federal operations, has grown.

Civil vs. Criminal: In a criminal case, the state government initiates the suit through a prosecutor. Persons convicted of a crime may be imprisoned, fined, or both. While in a civil case, the victim brings the suit. Civil cases involve individuals and organizations seeking to resolve legal disputes. However, persons found liable in a civil case may only have to give up property or pay money, but are not imprisoned.

Types of offense: Crimes include both felonies (more serious offenses -- like murder or rape) and misdemeanors (less serious offenses -- like petty theft or jaywalking). Felonies are usually crimes punishable by imprisonment of a year or more, while misdemeanors are crimes punishable by less than a year.

Conviction: All statutes describing criminal behavior can be broken down into their various elements. Most crimes (with the exception of strict-liability crimes) consist of two elements: an act, or "actus reus," and a mental state, or "mens rea." Prosecutors have to prove each and every element of the crime to yield a conviction. Furthermore, the prosecutor must persuade the jury or judge "beyond a reasonable doubt" of every fact necessary to constitute the crime charged. In civil cases, the plaintiff needs to show a defendant is liable only by a "preponderance of the evidence," or more than 50%.

Classification of crimes
Generally, crimes are classified as treason, felony, or misdemeanor. The fundamental distinction between felonies and misdemeanors rests with the penalty and the power of imprisonment. In general, a misdemeanor is an offense for which a punishment other than death or imprisonment in the state prison is prescribed by law. The term "degree of crime" refers to distinctions in the culpability of an offense because of the circumstances surrounding its commission.

Crimes are sometimes divided according to their nature into crimes mala in se and crimes mala prohibita; the former class comprises those acts that are thought to be immoral or wrong in themselves, or naturally evil, such as murder, rape, arson, burglary, larceny, and the like; the latter class embraces those acts that are not naturally evil but are prohibited by statute because they infringe on the rights of others (e.g., acts in restraint of trade that have been made criminal under antitrust legislation).

Punishment
The power to define crimes and set punishment for them rests with the legislatures in the United States. This power in the states is restricted by the federal Constitution. In the Fourteenth Amendment and in prohibitions against acts of attainder (an act of attainder is a legislative declaration that a particular individual is guilty of a crime) and against ex post facto laws (laws that retroactively declare certain actions to be criminal). State constitutions may also limit state legislative action. The courts cannot look further into the propriety of a penal statute than to ascertain whether the legislature has the power to enact it. Administrative rules may have the force of law, and violations of such rules are punishable as public offenses, provided that the legislature has made such violations misdemeanors.

Common-law crime
As distinguished from crimes specified by statute, a common-law crime is one punishable under common law. In many U.S. jurisdictions, including some in which comprehensive criminal statutes have been enacted, the common law in relation to crimes and criminal procedure has been recognized by the courts as in force, except insofar as it has been abrogated or repealed, expressly or impliedly, by statute. Thus the state may prosecute crimes that were indictable at common law even though they may not be denominated as such or be provided for by statute.

In many other jurisdictions the courts have held the common law as to crimes as being abolished, and no act is punishable as a crime unless it is made so by statute, or unless the act is made punishable as a crime by the constitution. Criminal procedure is entirely regulated by statute. There are no common-law offenses against the United States, and one may be subject to punishment for crime in a federal court only for the commission or omission of an act defined by statute or regulation having legislative authority, and then only if punishment is authorized by Congress.

In general, crimes must be defined in a penal statute with appropriate certainty and definiteness; a criminal statute that fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that the contemplated conduct is forbidden by the statute violates the constitutional requirement of due process of law.

Criminal Intention
Except as otherwise provided by statute, to constitute a crime an overt act (actus reus) must be accompanied by a criminal intent (mens rea) or by such negligence as is regarded by law as equivalent to a criminal intent. Motive, or that which leads or tempts the mind to indulge in a criminal act, as distinguished from intent, is neither a crime nor an essential element of a crime. The motive with which an offense was committed is immaterial. Proof of motive may be material in proving that the defendant committed a particular crime, but it is not essential to a conviction.

Further reading resources

Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers: The 7th ...
Puerto Rico Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers ... The 7th Addresses Pros and Cons of Full v. Limited Post-Booker Remands (Sort of) ...

Pros and cons of public defenders | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle
Jun 18, 2008 ... Pros and cons of public defenders. By LISA FALKENBERG ... David Mitcham, a criminal defense attorney who just got elected to a Harris County ...

Pros and Cons of In-person vs. Telephonic DMV Hearings
There are pros and cons to each method. Telephonic APS Hearing ... Darren Kavinoky is a Los Angeles-based criminal defense lawyer who practices throughout ...

Criminal Lawyer Marketing and Lead Generation » Criminal Defense ...
We sell leads to criminal defense lawyers from out many web sites. ... Pros - Simple. Cons - Costs range from a few hundred dollars a month to a few hundred ...

San Fernando Valley Criminal Attorney | Los Angeles Criminal ...
Criminal Defense Lawyers Serving Los Angeles and San Fernando Valley. ... We will discuss the pros and cons of going to trial and assist you in making the ...

NYSDA Resources - NYS Defenders Assoc - Public Defense Backup ...
Criminal defense lawyers and others who work on behalf of the accused can find a wealth of ... To learn more about the pros and cons of these programs, ...

Three Stikes Laws and Criminal Defense « Blackford and Flohr - Law ...
Apr 1, 2008 ... Three strikes laws can complicate criminal defense procedures for clients ... Pros and Cons. Under Maryland law, individual charges are each ...

Criminal Defense in Travis & Williamson County, Texas: Facts ...
This Blog will also discuss the wisdom of a trial and the pros and cons ... Labels: Lauerman ACDLA Austin Criminal Defense Lawyers Association Travis Reposa ...

New Jersey Criminal Defense Lawyer | North Arlington Municipal ...
Contact North Jersey criminal defense lawyer Howard L. Egenberg in North ... you through the pros and cons of all decisions that you will need to make. ...

Boston ERISA Law Blog: Coverage Arbitration Pros and Cons
Jul 14, 2006 ... In seminars I have given, I often discuss the pros and cons of .... Florida Criminal Defense Lawyer & Attorney - Ronald Chapman Law Firm ...